Talk stems are sentence starters that structure and guide the expression of thinking. Student classroom talk is a critical aspect of successful learning, engagement and ownership, vocabulary acquisition, reading comprehension, writing development, and critical thinking. There is a strategic difference between "telling students to talk" and establishing a purpose and expectations for student discourse. Students need to know the purpose for each engagement and the behavioral and rigor expectations for their discussions. Additionally, students must be given repeated scaffolded opportunities to practice academic talk. Explore the resources to learn about the different types of student talk, which meet specific academic and vocabulary objectives, as well as a wide variety of differentiation strategies to support all students in engaging in meaningful academic and accountable talk opportunities.
1. Select/create a few sentence stems to meet content objectives. For example, for students to explain, justify, or defend their thinking:
I think this because....
My main reason for thinking this is....
The most important reason this is true is....
2. Test your sentence stems by formulating questions of your own to prompt student use of sentence stems.
Note these where you'll have them handy, such as in your lesson plan or lesson notes or on an anchor chart.
3. Always state a purpose for a student conversation. For example, "I want you to summarize what you just read and tell your partner." Make sure the sentence stems you provide for students matches the purpose of the talk.
4. The first time you use sentence stems, introduce and model using sentence stems with a peer or student. Part of this process includes modeling the acceptance of feedback.
Have students first observe and share what they noticed.
What did you see us doing?
What did you hear?
How do you think it felt for the person listening? For the person talking?
Have students practice with a partner, while you observe. Try not to intervene or help.
Debrief the strategy with students.
What didn't work?
What can be done to improve our talk?
5. Create greater talk accountability by closing with a share out, asking students what their partner or another group member said.
6. Prior to the next accountable and/or academic talk, quickly review the previous reflection as well as the talk stems.
Continue using Step 4 until students are experienced using accountable talk stems.
Return to Step 4 at any point when students might be struggling. This often occurs when the rigor of the questions increases.
Peer feedback stems guide students in giving and responding to feedback.
The student using talk stems to provide feedback is guided to select specific information or to dig into their thinking in order to fulfill the specificity of the sentence stem, thus upping the rigor of the learning experience.
The student who is responding to the feedback is provided with meaningful, timely feedback that allows them to revise their thinking and work, thus growing their understanding. Also, the student responding to feedback can use sentences stems to ask for greater specificity, examples, or to disagree, so that they can interpret and act on the feedback.
Accountability measures, revision time, and clear expectations significantly increase the impact of peer feedback.
Can you build on existing classroom talk protocols to put this strategy in place?
What are some ways to support students, and yourself, in remembering to use productive classroom talk?
Are there ways to integrate this strategy into ongoing vocabulary instruction and practice?