Students work in partners on the Think About It problem (part a, above the line). After 2-3 minutes of work time, I ask students to identify what the problem is asking us to find.
I then have students share out the different ways that Jane can make snack packs. As an engagement strategy, I have students call on a peer after they've given their response. This continues until all possibilities are shared.
I frame the lesson by telling students that they're going to have to use what they know about factors and multiples, and decide which of these concepts to apply while solving real-world problems.
This lesson doesn't contain new material. Rather, students are applying what they know about GCF and LCM, and will need to decide which concept to use in each situation.
We continue the problem about Jane and her snack packs in the Guided Practice section. Because of their work on the Think About It problem, students are quickly able to share that Jane can make 4 snack packs. I extend student thinking by asking what would be in each snack pack.
I ask everyone to write a response to part c, to summarize how finding factors helped them to answer the questions on this page. Student responses may look like: "We knew that the factors of number divide into a number with no remainder. We also knew that the common factors of two numbers divide evenly into both numbers, which told us how many snack packs we could make."
I use cold call to question students about the second problem in this set.
Students work in pairs on the Partner Practice problem set. For each question in this set, I've asked students to decide if they need to use factors and multiples, and I expect them to write a justification for their choices before solving the problems. I want students thinking: To solve problems involving events happening in cycles, it may be helpful to find multiples and common multiples. To solve problems involving dividing groups evenly, it may be helpful to find factors and common factors.
As students are working , I circulate around the room and check in with each pair. I am looking for:
After 15 minutes of partner practice, students work independently on the Check for Understanding problem. I have students vote on whether this problem requires factors or multiples. Seeing this data from kids allows me to make a list of students to support at the start of independent practice. I have one student present his/her work to the class under the document camera.
Students work on the Independent Practice problem set.
In this problem set, I decided to not to have students explicitly write whether or not they're using factors or multiples to solve each problem. I want students to go through this thought process on their own, without the scaffold of me asking.
As I circulate, I keep an eye out for student answers to problem 2. Students should be able to quickly determine the LCM of 6 and 15. However, to correctly respond to the question, students need to recontextualize the 30, and write that the two events will both happen again at 12:30. If I see students writing simply 30, I'll ask them if the number 30 makes sense, given what the problem is asking them.
After independent practice time, I have students share with their partners the strategies they used to solve Problem 5. Students get really excited about chicken nugget problems. As a class, we discuss problem 1. I have students show me on their fingers how many possibilities there are for Part A.