See my Do Now in my Strategy folder that explains my beginning of class routines.
Often, I create do nows that have problems that connect to the task that students will be working on that day. Today I want students to apply what they know about inequalities to the Log Peeler ride. How can we show that the minimum height is 32 and the maximum height is 48? Students may struggle to represent this with an inequality and that is okay. I tell students to write something they think might work. It might be easier for students to start by creating the graph and then move to writing the inequality.
I present “h is greater than or equal to 32 inches” as the inequality. I ask students to share their opinion of my inequality. I argue that the minimum height is 32 inches, so you have to be 32 inches tall or taller. I want students to argue that the maximum height is 48, so you cannot be taller than 48 inches. Then I follow their lead and declare the inequality must be “h is less than or equal to 48 inches”. Again I ask for student input. Students are engaging in MP3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. Finally I move to the graph and ask students how we would show the height requirements on the graph. The graph should have a closed dot at 32 and at 48. You can ride the ride if you are 32 inches, 48 inches, or any height in between those two measurements. If students do not come up with it, I show them that we can represent that with an inequality of 32 is less than or equal to h is less than or equal to 48.
I have students move into their groups. We work on problem 1 together. I ask students to raise their hands and share out ideas. For 1e, student participate in a Think Write Pair Share. I want students to realize that the temperature could not be -2.5 degrees, because that is colder than -2 degrees. I plot -2.5 degrees on the number line.
Students work on problem 2 by themselves. After a couple minutes we come together and share ideas. For the graph, I ask students whether the circle should be open or closed. A common mistake is students confuse what to do with the circle. If this occurs, I reread the problem and ask students, “Can the elevator have 999.5 pounds on it? Why or why not?”
I review expectations and pass out a Group Work Rubric for each group. Students are engaging in MP2: Reason abstractly and quantitatively and MP4: Model with mathematics. I walk around and monitor student progress and behavior. I Post A Key, so that one representative of each group can check their work on a page before moving on.
Some students may struggle with translating a situation into an inequality or a graph. Phrases like “at least” and “no more than” can be confusing. If a group is struggling with this, I will give them a different situation using the same phrase. For example, I may say, “I need at least 3 pencils.” I have the students give me a number of pencils that they think will work. “Can you give me 4 pencils? 3 pencils? 2 pencils? Why or why not?” Then we go back to the situation in the problem and I ask similar questions.
In problems 5 and 6 I want students to use the context of the problem to consider their inequality and graph. For instance, in problem 5 it says that Alex can spend at most $50.25. Students will likely come up with d is less than or equal to $50.25. But can Alex really go to the store and spend -$5.19? I want students to think about what can actually happen at the store and create a new inequality and graph.
If a group successfully completes their work, I ask them to explain their work for problem 5 and 6. Then they can choose to work on the Inequality Puzzles or to create Inequality Posters.
For Closure I show students the number line with the letters. I ask students to jot down what they know from looking at the number line. Students participate in a Think Write Pair Share. Some students may create inequalities that involve two or three letters. Other students may share that “a” is the smallest value on the number line or that “e” is the greatest value on the number line.
Then I ask: