SWBAT complete the first construction of the Defining Pi Project, and begin to learn that successively more-sided n-gons will allow us better approximate the circumference of a circle.

Students experience firsthand a famous method for approximating pi to successively greater levels of precision.

10 minutes

When students arrive for class, the opening problem is posted on the board:

**What is the area of an equilateral triangle that has three sides 100 cm in length?**

As they set to work, I divide the chalkboard into two columns, labeled Problem_Solving and Background_Knowledge. After a few minutes, I ask for the first step in solving this problem, and if students have been following along in this course, they know that they should start by sketching the and labeling the triangle. I then ask what background knowledge we might need. The first thing I'm looking for is the formula for the area of a triangle. When students come up with this, I make a bullet point in that column, and write "I need to know the formula for the area of a triangle," followed by the formula.

We notice that we already know the length of the base of the triangle, so now we just need the height. I ask how we're going to find that - can we do it without a calculator? What background knowledge will we need here? This gets us to review the idea that the height of this triangle will split it into two congruent halves, and that our knowledge of 30/60/90 triangles can help us find the exact value of the height without making any calculations. Some students want a little review of this, and I encourage them to find it in their notes or to ask a neighbor for help - these are both habits I want to cultivate, and I want to build coherence between tasks throughout the year. I want students to notice that they're using something they studied a month ago, and I want them to feel comfortable writing the height, and therefore area in terms of root 3. By the end of the conversation the board looks like this.

60 minutes

The next step on our first Constructions Sheet is an opportunity to apply what we just saw in the opener. If they couldn't already, students should now be able to find the area of a component equilateral triangle inside of their hexagon. I circulate and make sure they're able to do it, and I'm looking to make sure that everyone feels comfortable writing this number in simplest radical form and not as a rounded decimal. When I see that they've done it, I ask them if they can find the area of the entire hexagon (with reference to **yesterday's conversation** about common sense).

One question students might have is whether they have to multiply 6 by the coefficient, root 3, or both. Depending on how many students ask the question, I might put a few examples on the board with variables where root 3 was or I might just ask them to check for equivalence by entering expressions into their calculators.

Other students are able to see that it wouldn't be too hard to develop a formula for the area of an equilateral triangle, and I encourage this extension into abstraction! (This algebraic generalization plays a big role in Part 4 of the project.)

With all fields of the **Construction Sheet** now complete, students can move on to the **Analysis Chart** at the bottom of the page. Here are some of ideas I try to share with students, either through whole class discussion or by circulating table by table:

**Difference between Circle's Circumference and Polygon's Perimeter:**Note that up to now we've been keeping all numbers as exact values, and now this pays off. On the calculator, we're able to type the circumference in terms of π, and perimeter in terms of root 3, so we can trust that there are no rounding errors in the difference between the two. Exact values are one useful tool for achieving precision.**Percent of Circle's Area covered by Polygon:**Students should estimate first by looking at the diagram on their page. Clearly the hexagon does not cover the whole circle, but it just as clearly covers more than half. I ask students what they think, and I write some estimates on the board. (The correct answer is ~82.7%.) I also remind students of our attention to parentheses when they're writing this ratio on their calculators.**Perimeter of Polygon / Diameter of Circle:**Everyone in the room gets a nice simple value of 3 here, and it always surprises kids more than I expect. A few things here: first this is the value of π assumed by the protagonist of the third opening problem in Day 1 of this project. I call attention to this, and I ask how reasonable it is, based on this construction, to assume the π = 3. Secondly, I begin to lead students toward abstraction with a simple count: we can count two radii across this circle and we can count six radii around the hexagon. No matter what the value of r, what is 6r/2r? Inevitably, this illustration opens a few students up to a new frontier in their knowledge of algebraic understanding.**Area of Polygon / r^2:**This is super abstract, and probably won't have too much meaning yet for too many students. That's ok. Encourage the ones who really want to get it to investigate the area of a circle, but for many, the idea that it's again self-checking is good enough for now. We'll watch this story develop over the rest of the project.

As I mentioned above, students are usually very surprised and excited to see the same values as their neighbors in the last three rows of this chart. This leads to a discussion of relative values (which are the same) vs. absolute differences (which are different). Over the years, students have called this cool, crazy, or creepy. When kids say “that’s crazy” about numbers appearing in everyone’s work, I make sure to point out that now they’re “doing analysis,” and our work here as teachers is to make that analysis richer. When you say "that's crazy," I explain, you're doing half of the work of analysis. The other half is to ask "why?" and figure out what's happening. (As a general principle, I like to create opportunities for students to say that something is crazy as often as possible.)

As for that explanation here, I ask students to think back to the first day of the semester. What was one of the key words we studied? It was * similarity* - and similarity explains why the percentage is the same: no matter how big or how small the circle, no matter what unit of measurement I use, or what I decide the radius should be (as we did here), the relationship between the hexagon and circle is going to be the same. That's percentages and ratios do - the capture the relationships between measurements, and as we have seen before, when shapes are similar, we know that these relationships are going to be the same. It's so satisfying to come back to a word like this, for both me and my students!

Finally, we're done with the first construction, and hopefully it pays off in students comfort levels with their next two constructions. Before moving on, we read briefly through **one man's (slightly snarky) definition of π**, and I tell students that we're going to see a method for this "harmless exercise" works.

5 minutes

See the Defining Pi Project, Day 1 for an overview of **Record Sheets**. As students find their Record Sheets and get started, I note that when they write their paper about this project, I am going to ask them to quote their Record Sheets as evidence of what they were thinking as they worked.

**Today's prompts:**

- Write a sentence about what you did in class today.
- Write one question you have about the work we did in class today.
- On a scale of 1 to 10, how much perseverance did you demonstrate in class today?