Learning Targets: Learning Targets

 
 
 
Learning Targets
Teacher In Action
 
 
Teacher In Action
 
 
 
Instructional Openings

Learning Targets

Learning Targets are specific skill goals that align the work we do each day with the long-term goals my students and I have set at the beginning of the year. This strategy is a part of the larger mastery system in place in my self-paced blended learning classroom. By dissecting large skills into smaller Learning Targets, my students are more effectively able to self-assess their progress towards mastery in each of these skills. By emphasizing assessment for learning and achievement at high levels on specific Learning Targets, we take the focus off of assessment for the sole purpose of grading and gradually replace it with student ownership of their learning.

Strategy Resources (3)
Teacher In Action
 
 
Student Handout
 
 
This is the learning target log that helps my students with comprehension of the learning targets associated with our thermodynamics unit. My students will self assess over the course of our learning cycle and should continuously evaluate their own proficiency level. These help generate dialogue around how my students can improve their subsequent work.
Student Handout
 
 
After completing activities for a given unit aligned to the established learning targets, my students will take a quantitative exam that is purposefully aligned to those same learning targets as well. By organizing the questions into groups of learning targets, I reinforce the interconnectivity of chemistry standards and highlight how mastery can be demonstrated in exam form.
Teacher In Action
 
 
Student Handout
 
 
This is the learning target log that helps my students with comprehension of the learning targets associated with our thermodynamics unit. My students will self assess over the course of our learning cycle and should continuously evaluate their own proficiency level. These help generate dialogue around how my students can improve their subsequent work.
Student Handout
 
 
After completing activities for a given unit aligned to the established learning targets, my students will take a quantitative exam that is purposefully aligned to those same learning targets as well. By organizing the questions into groups of learning targets, I reinforce the interconnectivity of chemistry standards and highlight how mastery can be demonstrated in exam form.
Jeff Astor
Cindy and Bill Simon Technology Academy High School
Los Angeles, CA


 

About this strategy

Prep Time:
Moderate
Subject:
Science
Grade:
Tenth grade
Similar Strategies
Routines and Procedures
Student Binders

We don't use text books in our class, we make them. Each student is given a binder at the beginning of the year. The binder becomes a reference book for the students as they fill it up with the lessons they have completed. Many standard textbooks have become a diluted hodepdoge of information, hard for most students (and even myself) to decipher. This binder allows me to create a resource tailored to my students.

 
Blended Learning Model Overviews
Jeff's Model Overview

I would describe my classroom model as a tweak on a flex model of instruction. I start each class period by giving students a problem I want them to solve, such as “How would you use the gas laws to explain how popcorn pops?” Students then have the opportunity to create their own learning paths by accessing a variety of curated online and offline resources and activities. I determine if a student has achieved mastery on a given concept by evaluating the online and offline work products they have produced during class and by administering more traditional assessments. However, if a student fails an assessment, he or she can always go back and re-take it. My classroom is 1:1 with a mix of MacBooks and iPads, which have become the vehicle for my students to move at their own pace through difficult chemistry content.

Number of Students: ~ 36 students/period

Number of Adults: one teacher

Length of Class Period/Learning Time: 120 minutes (M, T, Th, F); 45 minutes (W)

Digital Content/Ed Tech Tools Used on a Regular Basis: CK-12 BrainGenie; Google Apps for Education; eduCanon; Formative; YouTube; Screencast-O-Matic; Wikispaces; Weebly; Versal; Common Curriculum

Hardware Used on a Regular Basis: MacBook computers (1:1); 2nd Generation iPads; SMARTboard; Surface Pro 3 (for teacher)

Key Features: competency-based; content in multiple formats; problem-based; gamification; student agency

 
Feedback Systems
Teamwork Evaluation Rubric

At the end of any collaborative activity, each student makes a copy of this Teamwork Evaluation Rubric and fills out the boxes with his/her thoughts on the overall quality of their group's teamwork. The rubric includes multiple indicators of high-quality teamwork and encoruages discussion about how to improve future iterations. Indicators include noise level (framed as concern for other group's ability to work effectively), quality of work produced, overall teamwork, and level of grit. Students assess their own contributions to their collaborative assignment as well as their teammates' contributions. Students can insert glows and grows where they explicitly discuss their feelings regarding their own work and the work of their peers. I frame this activity as a team-building exercise. Evaluating collaborative assignments can be complicated. The Teamwork Evaluation Rubric allows me to collect a good deal of data about individual student's contributions from multiple perspectives, which is both a fair and thorough way to assess individuals and the team as a whole.

 
 
Something went wrong. See details for more info
Nothing to upload
details
close